Filed in archive
General
by Greg Cruey on February 15, 2009
So now there's a stimulus package pretty much in place. And whatever all the Right Wingers in the blogosphere may think about it, it's based at least partly on Keynesian economic theory. Will it work? Time will tell.
Bruce Bartlett (not a Bush fan), had an excellent column in Forbes late last month on Keynes, the Depression, and the modern critique of Keynesian economics. He also does a good job of explaining the different roles of fiscal policy and monetary policy. And he describes the role of Alan Greenspan in the development of the economic insanity that helped fuel the current meltdown.
Dick Morris does a good rendition of the "less spending, smaller government" song.
Economics - why that's just a subsection of the study of human behavior, the redheaded step-cousin of science. And half-truths are all you get...

Photo courtesy of iStockphoto, Image# 6052832
Bruce Bartlett (not a Bush fan), had an excellent column in Forbes late last month on Keynes, the Depression, and the modern critique of Keynesian economics. He also does a good job of explaining the different roles of fiscal policy and monetary policy. And he describes the role of Alan Greenspan in the development of the economic insanity that helped fuel the current meltdown.
Dick Morris does a good rendition of the "less spending, smaller government" song.
Republicans should stay away in droves. On this issue, they can recapture something they have lost over the past eight years - the mantra of less spending and smaller government.Geoff Gannon at Seeking Alpha provides a good analysis of how Keynes fits into modern thought. And he looks at the role of corporate America:
Our biggest problem is not underconsumption; it is balance sheet weakness.Perhaps my favorite piece was at Free Republic:
The stimulus promoters suffer from man with a hammer syndrome. They have just one tool. It may be a powerful tool. I'm not arguing that point. I don't have to. It's the wrong tool for the job.
Economic policy is based on a collection of half-truths. The nature of these half-truths changes occasionally. Economics as a scholarly discipline consists in the periodic rediscovery and refinement of old half-truths... We know that a few extreme approaches that have been tried yield lousy results - central planning, self-regulating financial markets - but we don't know much that is constructive beyond that.My undergraduate degree combined psychology and sociology - the study of human behavior, individual and corporate. It's the redheaded stepchild of real science. The number of variables to be accounted for in the study of human behavior (alone or in groups) is huge, and ethical considerations almost always prevent the manipulation of at least some of those variables. The result is a decreased level of scientific credibility.
Economics - why that's just a subsection of the study of human behavior, the redheaded step-cousin of science. And half-truths are all you get...

Photo courtesy of iStockphoto, Image# 6052832
Permalink: Stimulus Hype: Sorting Out Keynes (Part III)
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/142938
Mr Wong
Vote for Stimulus Hype: Sorting Out Keynes (Part III):
|
Rating: 6.75 out of 4 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
sohbet
(02/15/09 10:57am)
Turkiyenin en iyi online chat sohbet sitesi
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |















